On The way (My book)

  

 

 

 

ON THE WAY......

Raghupati Jha


 

 

 

 

On the way…

स्वधर्मो निधनं श्रेयः परधर्मो भयावहः

(Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 3, Verse 35)

                      It is better to die performing your own duty; the duty of another is full of danger.

Acknowledgement & Gratitude

I do not claim that these thoughts are entirely mine. Whatever clarity has come, it has come through many voices, many seekers, many paths.

 

Bhagavad Gita:

It showed me that action is not the problem — attachment is.

Osho:

The only sin human beings can commit is unawareness. From him, I learned that awareness itself is transformation.

Mandukya Upanishad:

It pointed towards the nature of consciousness—waking, dreaming, deep sleep, and beyond all these, Turiya (the fourth state), which is silent, formless, and untouched.

Kabir:

माला कहे है काठ की, अरे तू क्या फेरे मोय

मन का मनका फेर दे, सो तुरत मिला दूँ तोय

 

भला हुआ मोरी माला टूटी

मैं तो राम भजन से छूटी रे

मोरे सर से टली बला

 

माला फेरों न कर जपों

और मुख से कहूँ न राम

राम हमारा हमें जपे रे

हम पायो बिसराम

 

Ramakrishna Paramahansa:

जतो मत, ततो पथ

(As many Faiths, so many paths.)


 


 

 

ON THE WAY......

Raghupati Jha


 

 

 

 

On the way…

स्वधर्मो निधनं श्रेयः परधर्मो भयावहः

(Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 3, Verse 35)

                      It is better to die performing your own duty; the duty of another is full of danger.

Acknowledgement & Gratitude

I do not claim that these thoughts are entirely mine. Whatever clarity has come, it has come through many voices, many seekers, many paths.

 

Bhagavad Gita:

It showed me that action is not the problem — attachment is.

Osho:

The only sin human beings can commit is unawareness. From him, I learned that awareness itself is transformation.

Mandukya Upanishad:

It pointed towards the nature of consciousness—waking, dreaming, deep sleep, and beyond all these, Turiya (the fourth state), which is silent, formless, and untouched.

Kabir:

माला कहे है काठ की, अरे तू क्या फेरे मोय

मन का मनका फेर दे, सो तुरत मिला दूँ तोय

 

भला हुआ मोरी माला टूटी

मैं तो राम भजन से छूटी रे

मोरे सर से टली बला

 

माला फेरों न कर जपों

और मुख से कहूँ न राम

राम हमारा हमें जपे रे

हम पायो बिसराम

 

Ramakrishna Paramahansa:

जतो मत, ततो पथ

(As many Faiths, so many paths.)


 

Contents

Chapter 1: The First Disturbance. 5

Chapter 2: The Loop. 7

Chapter 3: The Pull Towards Silence. 9

Chapter 4: The Conflict of Two Directions. 11

Chapter 5: Can I Trust What I Feel?. 13

Chapter 6: The Memory of Love. 14

Chapter 7: The Many Versions of Me. 16

Chapter 8: What Is Truth Then?. 17

Chapter 9: The Two Ways of Living. 18

Chapter 10: The Desire to Escape. 19

Chapter 11: Staying With What Is. 20

Chapter 12: When Understanding Becomes Another Trap. 21

Chapter 13: The Fear of Losing Myself 22

Chapter 14: The Ordinary Moment. 23

Chapter 15: Nothing Stays. 24

Chapter 16: The Way I Loved. 25

Chapter 17: When It Doesn't Come Back. 26

Chapter 18: Devotion Without Knowing. 27

Chapter 19: The Pattern I Keep Repeating. 28

Chapter 20: Where I Stand Now.. 29

Chapter 21: Not a Conclusion. 30

Bonus : The Act of Slowing Down. 31

 

 


 

Chapter 1: The First Disturbance

 

It did not begin with understanding. It began with something being off.

There was no clear reason for it. Nothing dramatic happened. Life, from the outside, was moving normally. Conversations were happening. Work was going on. People were around. Nothing was missing in a visible way.

Yet something inside did not sit right.

It was not sadness. It was not exactly anxiety. It was not even confusion in the usual sense. It was more like a constant background noise.

Something was always running. Even in moments where everything should have been calm, there was movement inside — not physical movement, but mental. A kind of inner activity that did not stop.

At first, it was ignored. Like most things are. Because it did not demand attention strongly. It was subtle. Manageable. Easy to distract from.

But over time, it became more visible. Not because it became stronger, but because I started noticing it.

It started with small observations. Sitting alone, and suddenly realising that the mind is not quiet. There is always something: a replay of something that already happened, a preparation for something that has not happened, an imagined conversation, a response to a question nobody asked.

And it was not occasional. It was continuous.

One moment it was about the past — revisiting something that had already ended. Not just remembering it, but modifying it. ‘What if I had said this instead?’ ‘What if that moment had gone differently?’ Even when I knew clearly that nothing could be changed, the mind kept trying, as if it had the power to rewrite reality.

Another moment, it shifted to the future. Not planning in a practical way, but preparing mentally for situations that may never happen. Someone asking a question. Someone judging. Someone misunderstanding. And I would start answering, explaining, defending — all inside my own head.

This was strange. Because there was no real situation. Yet the body was reacting. The heart rate would change. There would be a slight tension, a sense of alertness, as if something important was actually happening.

This is where the first crack appeared. A simple but uncomfortable question: if nothing is happening outside, then why is so much happening inside?

At first, I thought this was normal — that everyone must be like this. And maybe that is true. But that did not answer the real question. Normal does not mean understood.

The more I observed, the more I saw a pattern. The mind does not stay empty. It fills itself. If there is no real input, it creates its own. And once it creates, it starts believing.

There was also something else — a very subtle attachment to these thoughts. Even when they were uncomfortable, there was a tendency to stay with them, to keep thinking, to go deeper. Almost as if stopping them was not even considered.

It was not just about thoughts. The body was involved. A thought about something stressful would create a physical reaction. And that physical reaction would make the thought feel more real. Then the mind would say: ‘See, this is important.’ And the cycle would continue.

Slowly, it became clear that this was not random. There was a structure to it — a loop. A thought appears. The body reacts. The reaction confirms the thought. And the thought becomes stronger.

Once this was seen, something shifted. Not solved. Not removed. But seen. And that changes something. Because before this, everything felt like one single experience. Now, there was a small distance — a slight separation between what is happening and the one noticing it.

This separation was not stable. Sometimes it was there. Sometimes it disappeared. Sometimes I was fully inside the thought. Sometimes I could watch it. But once you see something even once, you cannot completely unsee it.

And that is how it started — not with truth, not with realisation, but with a disturbance. A quiet noticing that something inside is always moving.


 

Chapter 2: The Loop

 

After the first disturbance was noticed, it did not take long to see that it was not just random noise. There was a pattern to it. At first, it looked like thoughts coming and going, as they always do. But when seen closely, it was not that simple. Thoughts were not just appearing and disappearing. They were building something, and that something was repeating.

A thought would appear — sometimes very small, almost harmless. It could be about something that had already happened or something that might happen. On its own, it did not seem powerful. But the moment attention went to it, something changed. The body started reacting: a slight tightening in the chest, a small shift in breathing, a faint sense of alertness. Nothing extreme, but enough to be felt.

Then something strange would happen. The body’s reaction would not stay separate — it would feed the thought. The mind would look at the sensation and interpret it: ‘If the body is reacting, this must be important.’ That one conclusion was enough to give the thought weight. It was no longer just a passing idea. It had become something real — something that needed to be understood, solved, or controlled.

Once it reached that stage, it did not stop. The mind would start expanding it. One thought would lead to another, and then another. The situation would become more detailed, more intense. Conversations would be imagined. Outcomes would be predicted. Problems would be created and then attempts to solve them would follow — all of this without anything actually occurring outside.

At the same time, the body kept responding. The more the thought expanded, the more the body reacted. The more the body reacted, the more the mind believed the thought. It became a closed system — thought influencing body, body confirming thought — with no external check, no interruption, just a continuous loop feeding itself.

The most confusing part was that it felt real. Not logically real, but experientially real. Even when there was an awareness that nothing was actually happening, the feeling did not match that understanding. The body does not care about logic; it responds to what is being experienced internally. So even an imagined situation could create real stress, real fear, real discomfort.

At some point, the loop would become exhausting. There would be a moment of stepping back — either out of awareness or simply tiredness — and suddenly everything would drop. The same thought that felt so heavy a few minutes ago would lose its intensity. The body would calm down. The urgency would disappear. And then a strange realisation would come: nothing had actually happened.

But this did not stop the loop from forming again. It would come back in a different form. Different thought, same structure. Different story, same pattern. It did not matter what the content was — whether it was about the past, the future, a person, a mistake, or a possibility. The mechanism remained the same.

Over time, it became clear that the problem was not any specific thought. Removing one thought did not change anything, because another one would take its place. The mind was not dependent on a particular topic — it only needed something to hold onto. Once it found something, it would build on it.

There was also a subtle pull to stay inside the loop. Even when it was uncomfortable, there was a kind of involvement in it. It was not forced — it was almost voluntary, but not consciously chosen. It felt like being drawn in, with attention constantly returning to the same thought as if trying to resolve it. But resolution never came.

This created another layer of confusion. If it is uncomfortable, why not leave it? If it is clearly not useful, why stay in it? There was no clear answer, because it did not feel like a decision — it felt automatic.

At some point, a different kind of observation began. Instead of focusing on the thought itself, the focus shifted to the process — not ‘what am I thinking?’ but ‘what is happening right now?’ And in that shift, the structure of the loop became more visible.

The moment attention stayed on a thought, the loop started. The moment attention moved away — even slightly — the loop weakened. It did not disappear instantly, but it lost its force. The connection between thought and body was not permanent; it was being maintained through attention.

This did not mean control. Thoughts still appeared, and it was not possible to simply stop them. But there was a difference between a thought appearing and a thought being followed. That small difference started to matter.

Gradually, a simple understanding formed — not as a conclusion, but as something directly observed. The mind creates, the body reacts, and together they convince each other. It is not one controlling the other; it is a cycle. And once seen, the question changed. It was no longer ‘how do I stop this?’ but ‘is it necessary to stay in it?’

The loop did not disappear. But it was no longer completely invisible. And that made all the difference.


 

Chapter 3: The Pull Towards Silence

 

After noticing the loop again and again, something else started happening — not planned, not even intentional. It came as a natural response. The more the mind was seen in this repetitive movement, the more there arose a quiet desire to step away from it. Not out of rejection or frustration, but more like a simple feeling: there must be something beyond this constant noise.

It was not a dramatic thought. It was softer — almost like a background pull. A curiosity mixed with tiredness. If the mind keeps running like this, creating loops and reacting to its own creations, then what is there when this stops? Or does it ever stop?

There were moments — very small ones — where the mind was not actively involved in anything. No strong thought, no emotional pull, no inner conversation. Just a kind of stillness. These moments were not created; they came on their own. And they did not stay for long. But something about them felt different. Not exciting. Not emotional. Just quiet. And strangely, in that quiet, nothing was missing.

The moment the mind noticed the silence, it would come back almost immediately, as if it could not tolerate that emptiness for too long. It would bring a thought — any thought — just to fill the space again. And then the usual process would start. But now there was a contrast.

Earlier, everything felt the same because there was no reference. Now there were two different experiences: the constant movement of the mind, and that brief stillness. And because both were seen, a question naturally followed — what is more real? The noise that keeps changing, or the silence that does not try to become anything?

This is where reading started to connect — not as belief, but as comparison. When I came across ideas from the Upanishads, especially the Mandukya Upanishad, they did not feel completely abstract. They spoke about states — waking, dreaming, deep sleep, and something beyond. Earlier, this had sounded like philosophy. But now, in a very small way, it felt relatable.

There was also this idea that what we usually experience is not the full picture — that there is something underlying all states, something that is not constantly changing the way thoughts and emotions do. I could not say I experienced that clearly, but the direction made sense. Because whatever I was observing inside myself was always changing. If something is always changing, can that be the final thing?

At the same time, there was another pull — a more practical one. Life was still happening: work, people, conversations, responsibilities. And even if I tried to think about only exploring silence, something inside did not fully agree. Because the same mind that wanted silence was also getting involved in life. This created a kind of inner contradiction.

This is where the question about detachment became stronger. Not as an idea from books, but as a personal confusion. If silence feels real in those brief moments, should everything else be reduced? Or is that another movement of the mind trying to escape something it does not understand?

Even when reading the Bhagavad Gita, it did not offer a simple conclusion. On one side, there is talk of detachment — of not being affected by outcomes. On the other side, there is action: not withdrawal, but participation; not leaving the battlefield, but standing in it.

These questions did not resolve anything immediately. But they changed the direction of looking. It was no longer just about stopping thoughts or escaping the loop. It became something deeper — understanding the place of both movement and stillness. The small glimpses of silence continued to appear, and disappear. They did not become stable. But they left an impression — not as something to chase, but as something that exists without effort. And that was enough to keep the question alive. Not answered. Just alive.


 

Chapter 4: The Conflict of Two Directions

 

As the observation deepened, one thing became more visible than before — not just the loop of thoughts or the occasional silence, but something more constant, something that stayed in the background of everything. A kind of inner conflict. Not loud. Not always disturbing. But present.

On one side, there was a pull towards silence. Those small gaps where nothing was running inside had a different quality — they did not excite, but they also did not disturb. There was no effort in them, no trying to become anything. Just a simple sense of being there without movement.

On the other side, life was still moving. Conversations, work, relationships, responsibilities. Situations that required attention, involvement, and decision. The mind had to function — think, respond, act. There was no way to stay completely withdrawn and still participate.

This created a strange position. Because both seemed valid. Silence felt true in one way. Involvement felt necessary in another. And the difficulty was not in choosing one over the other — it was that both were happening together.

At times, there was a desire to move away from everything — not out of hatred, but a quiet thought: if I reduce involvement, maybe the mind will become quieter. But at the same time, situations will come. People will come. Responsibilities will remain. And avoiding them does not feel like clarity — it feels incomplete.

In the Bhagavad Gita, there is the idea that action cannot be avoided, that even not acting is a form of action, and more importantly, that the focus is not on leaving action but on how action is performed (Bhagavad Gita 3.5). This shifted the question slightly. Maybe the problem is not the action itself. Maybe the problem is something within action.

There was also a repeated emphasis on detachment — not being affected by results, not getting lost in outcomes (Bhagavad Gita 2.47). But what does that actually mean in experience? Because when something happens, the reaction is immediate. Emotions come, thoughts come, the body responds. Detachment cannot simply mean becoming insensitive.

And slowly it became visible that the disturbance is not in the action itself — it is in the attachment to what comes from it. The mind does not just act; it also projects. It imagines results, creates expectations, holds onto possibilities. And when those do not match reality, disturbance comes.

So the conflict was not just between silence and action. It was also between expectation and reality. Even in moments of silence, if there was a subtle expectation — this should stay, this should deepen — that itself created movement. And in action, if there was a constant pull towards outcome, the action was never complete in itself.

This is where another kind of seeing started — not choosing silence over action, not choosing action over silence, but noticing how the mind moves in both. Both movements come from the same place: the mind trying to find stability. But stability does not seem to come from either. The question was no longer ‘which path is right?’ but: is it possible to live without dividing these two?


 

Chapter 5: Can I Trust What I Feel?

 

At some point, the problem was no longer just thoughts — not even the loop. Something more unsettling started to appear. It was the realisation that even my own experience might not be fully reliable.

Many times, the body was already in a certain state before any clear thought appeared. There would be a sudden uneasiness — no reason, no story, just a shift in the body. And almost immediately, the mind would try to explain it. It would search for a cause: something from the past, something about the future, something about a person. It did not matter what it picked — it just needed something to attach to.

But when seen carefully, that connection did not always feel true. The body reacted first. The mind explained later. This created a crack in something very basic — the idea that what I feel must be correct. Because if the body can react without a clear reason, and the mind can create a reason afterwards, then how much of what I feel is actually real?

There were moments where this became very visible. A sudden tension would appear in the body, and the mind would immediately say: something is wrong. Within seconds, a full story would form around it. But if attention stayed without jumping into the story, the sensation would slowly change. Sometimes it would even disappear without any explanation. Just gone.

Then the question came: if it can disappear on its own, was it ever pointing to something real? Or was it just a reaction passing through? This did not mean that everything is false. There are real situations, real emotions, real consequences. The confusion was not about denying reality — it was about seeing that not everything that feels real is actually pointing to something outside.

There were also moments where the reaction itself became the problem. The discomfort of it, the uneasiness of it. And then another thought would come: ‘Why is this happening?’ or ‘This should not be happening.’ Now it was no longer just a reaction — it had become resistance to the reaction. And that made it stronger.

So there are layers: a sensation, then a thought explaining it, then another thought resisting it. And all of this feels like one single experience. But when seen slowly, they are different.

This introduced doubt — not in a negative way, but in a clarifying way. Doubt about immediate conclusions. Doubt about the first explanation that comes. And in that doubt, there is a small space. Less certain. And that uncertainty, in some moments, feels more honest than false certainty. The body reacts. The mind explains. And somewhere in between, something watches. Not always. But sometimes. And those moments are enough to keep looking.


 

Chapter 6: The Memory of Love

 

Not all loops come from fear. Some come from something that once felt very real, very alive, and very complete — and those loops are harder to see clearly, because they do not feel like disturbance in the beginning. They feel like something valuable, something worth holding.

There were moments where connection with someone did not feel like effort — it was just there, naturally. Attention going towards them without trying. Thinking about them without forcing it. Wanting to share things, wanting to be seen by them. And somewhere in that, there was a sense of meaning, as though something in life had more depth than usual.

Without realising it, the mind started attaching not just to the person, but to the way it felt to be with them. The way it felt to be understood. The way it felt to be important in someone’s life. At that time, it did not look like attachment — it just felt natural. Like this is how things should be.

But slowly something started changing. Not immediately, not dramatically — just small shifts. Conversations reduced, energy changed, misunderstandings happened. And while all this was happening outside, something inside did not move at the same speed. The mind did not accept that the experience was changing. It kept holding onto what had been — replaying moments again and again. And in that replay, the experience almost felt alive again, even though it was not happening now.

This is where a different kind of loop started forming. Not like the earlier ones about fear or anxiety — this one was quieter but deeper. It was not trying to solve anything; it was trying to hold something, to keep it alive in some form. And there was also a subtle hope inside it: that maybe it could happen again. Maybe with the same person, maybe with someone else, but the same feeling, the same intensity.

Without noticing it clearly, the mind was not just remembering — it was comparing. Everything new was being seen through the lens of what had already happened. And because of that, nothing felt quite enough. Something always felt missing.

There were also moments where the mind went into the past not just to remember, but to change it — thinking about what could have been done differently. As if by thinking about it enough times, something might shift. But nothing changed. The situation was already over. Yet it continued inside, creating a strange state where memory, imagination, and longing all existed together.

At the same time, this was not something that could simply be dropped. Letting go felt like losing something important, even if that thing was no longer actually present. One part could see that holding on was creating disturbance, while another part did not want to let go. Because letting go felt like ending something completely.

Even after seeing all this, the pull does not disappear completely. The memories still come. The feelings still arise. But perhaps there is a small difference: earlier it all felt like the present; now sometimes it is seen as something being replayed. Just enough to notice that what is being held is not actually here anymore. And maybe that is where something begins to loosen. Not forced. Not decided. Just slowly, through seeing.


 

Chapter 7: The Many Versions of Me

 

At some point, the question was no longer just about thoughts or emotions. It slowly turned towards something more direct and uncomfortable: who exactly is the one going through all of this? Because the more I started looking, the less stable this ‘me’ felt. It did not feel like one solid thing — it felt like something that keeps changing depending on the situation, the person, the mood, even the time of day.

There are moments where I feel very clear, almost as though I understand things. And then there are moments where all of that disappears completely, and I am fully inside reactions, inside emotions, inside confusion. Both of these feel like me. But they are completely different from each other. And this is not just two versions — there are many.

With one person I behave in one way; with another, completely differently. In one situation I feel confident; in another, uncertain. In one moment I want silence; in another, I want connection. All of these feel real when they are happening. But when I look at them together, they do not form one clear identity — they contradict each other.

This creates a strange question: which one is actually me? The one who wants to be alone, or the one who wants to be with someone? The one who understands things, or the one who gets completely lost? There is no clear answer, because each version feels true when it appears.

There is also the identity given by the world — the name, the role, the work, the way others see me. Different people see different things. For one person I am understanding; for another, careless. For one I am important; for another, just another person. None of these is fully wrong, but none of them feels complete either.

Then there is the identity I create for myself — the story I tell myself. But even that keeps changing. Sometimes I feel like someone who is searching, trying to understand. Sometimes I feel like I am just confused, going in circles.

This is where something from the Upanishads starts to come into the picture again — not as something believed, but as something that connects slightly with what is being seen. The idea that what we usually identify as ‘self’ is not the complete picture; that there is something beyond the waking, dreaming, and deep sleep states (Mandukya Upanishad). While this is not fully understood, it creates a direction of looking.

At some point, a simple observation becomes clear: ‘me’ is not one thing. It is a collection of movements — thoughts, emotions, reactions, roles — all appearing and disappearing. And depending on which one is active, that becomes ‘me’ in that moment. The search is no longer about defining ‘me’ in a fixed way. It becomes more about watching how ‘me’ keeps forming and dissolving. Not defined. But seen.


 

Chapter 8: What Is Truth Then?

 

At some point, after looking at thoughts, loops, silence, body reactions, love, and even the shifting sense of ‘me’, a different kind of question started coming up — not about a specific experience, but about something more fundamental: what is actually true in all of this? Everything that is seen keeps changing. So if everything is changing, what can be called truth?

This question did not come from reading alone — it came from seeing contradiction. Not just in myself, but in what others have said. Different masters say different things, sometimes even opposite things. One says the world is illusion; another says the world is real but misunderstood. One says leave everything; another says live fully. All of them sound convincing in their own way.

This creates a confusion — not about who is right or wrong, but about the nature of truth itself. Because if truth is one, why are there so many different expressions of it?

There was a time when it felt like finding the right teaching would solve everything. But now it does not feel that simple, because even in those texts there are layers, different interpretations, different ways of understanding the same thing. And what I understand today might change tomorrow.

When reading about silence being the ultimate, it feels true in moments where the mind is quiet. But when life becomes active, that same statement feels incomplete. And when reading about action and duty, it feels relevant in daily life. But when sitting alone, it feels as though there is something beyond action. So both seem true in different moments — but not complete on their own.

There is also a line that becomes clearer over time — not as a belief, but as something that feels reasonable: truth does not need a perfect messenger, and no messenger deserves complete surrender. Because if something is true, it should stand on its own, not on the authority of who said it.

So the approach slowly changes — from trying to find truth somewhere outside, to observing what is happening directly. Not rejecting teachings, but not depending on them completely either. Using them as pointers, not as conclusions. The question ‘what is truth?’ remains open. Not answered. Not concluded. Because any answer given too quickly starts becoming another belief.


 

Chapter 9: The Two Ways of Living

 

At some point, after moving through all these observations, one question kept coming back in a very practical way: how should I live? Because whatever is being seen inside does not stay limited to thinking — it starts affecting choices, actions, direction, and the way everyday life feels.

There seem to be two very different directions. One is to move away from everything — reduce involvement, reduce noise, reduce desire — and slowly go towards silence. The other is to stay in life fully. To work, to build relationships, to experience things, to respond to situations, to take responsibility.

The difficulty is that both directions seem valid. There are moments where stepping back feels right — where silence feels more real than anything else. And there are moments where that same idea feels incomplete, almost like an escape.

The distinction becomes clearer when looking at it through what has been read. There is the path of the yogi, who leaves, who reduces, who moves towards the inner completely. And there is the path of the householder, who stays, who participates, who lives within the world. Both are valid — but they are not the same. A yogi can afford to step away. A householder cannot, at least not completely.

This is where the confusion was earlier — trying to apply one path to another kind of life. Trying to live in the world, but also trying to function like someone who has left it. That creates imbalance, because the expectations do not match the situation.

There is also something from the Bhagavad Gita that keeps coming back — that action is unavoidable, and that what matters is not avoiding action but how one relates to it (Bhagavad Gita 3.5). And also the idea of not being completely tied to outcomes (Bhagavad Gita 2.47).

A simple observation starts forming: whatever role is being played in the moment requires full presence. If working, then working fully. If talking to someone, then being there fully. And at the same time, not carrying that role beyond its time, not making it the whole identity. Because the problem is not the role itself. The problem is becoming the role.

Running away from life in the name of detachment creates its own conflict. And getting lost in life without awareness creates another. So neither extreme seems complete. It is not about defining the right path. It is more about seeing clearly what is happening in each direction. And slowly, through that, something may settle on its own. Not decided. Not forced. But understood through living.


 

Chapter 10: The Desire to Escape

 

At some point, it became difficult to ignore a very subtle but strong movement inside — something present in different forms across all these observations. And that was the desire to escape. Not always clearly visible, not always admitted, but present: sometimes appearing as a search for silence, sometimes as a need for clarity. But underneath all of that, there was a common direction — moving away from what feels uncomfortable.

It did not look like escape in the beginning. It looked like seeking — seeking truth, seeking peace, seeking understanding. But when seen more honestly, there were moments where this seeking was not coming from clarity, but from discomfort. From not wanting to feel certain things. From not wanting to stay with certain experiences.

For example, when the mind became too noisy, the immediate pull was towards silence. On the surface, this looked like a movement towards something deeper. But at the same time, there was also a sense that it was a reaction to discomfort. Not always. But sometimes.

There is also another form of escape that is less obvious — escaping into thinking. When something feels uncomfortable, instead of directly feeling it, the mind starts analysing, understanding, breaking it down. This feels like progress. But sometimes it is just another way of not staying with the actual experience. Even the search for truth can become an escape.

This does not mean that seeking is wrong, or that silence is not valid. It only shows that the intention behind it is not always clear. This creates another layer of observation — not just what I am doing, but why I am doing it.

And slowly, a pattern starts becoming visible. The mind does not like discomfort. It moves away from it — in different directions. Sometimes towards pleasure. Sometimes towards understanding. Sometimes towards silence. But the movement is the same: away from what is.

Seeing it changes something — not completely, but slightly. Because earlier, the movement felt like the right thing to do. Now sometimes, it is seen as a reaction. And in those moments, there is a small pause. Where nothing is done immediately. No escape. No solution. Just the discomfort. Those moments are not comfortable. But they are direct. Not moving away. Not fixing. Just being with what is there.


 

Chapter 11: Staying With What Is

 

After seeing the movement of escape in different forms, there were moments where something slightly different started happening — not as a practice, not as a decision, but almost as a consequence of seeing. Instead of immediately moving away from what felt uncomfortable, there was sometimes a pause. A small gap where nothing was done. And in that gap, the usual patterns did not start immediately.

This was not something stable. Most of the time, the old movement continued. But sometimes, just sometimes, there was a moment where the reaction was seen early enough, and instead of following it, there was just staying. Not trying to change it. Not trying to understand it. Not trying to escape it. Just staying with it.

This is not as simple as it sounds. Because when discomfort is there, the natural tendency is to move — to fix, to reduce, to distract. So staying feels almost unnatural.

There were also moments where this happened with body sensations. A sudden uneasiness, a tightness, a restlessness. Earlier, this would immediately turn into a problem. But in some moments, that chain did not fully form. The sensation was there, but it was not immediately converted into something else. And something unexpected happened: the sensation changed on its own. Without being solved. Without being understood. It came, stayed, and then slowly reduced.

Staying can easily turn into another form of doing — trying to stay, forcing attention, making it into a method. And the moment that happens, it becomes another effort, another control. So even here, there is something to watch: whether staying is natural, or whether it is being forced.

Those moments of natural staying are not special. They do not feel like realisation. They are very ordinary. But in those ordinary moments, something is slightly different. There is no rush. No immediate need to change anything. And maybe that is enough for now — not a solution, not an end, just a different way of being with what is already there. Without moving away immediately. Just staying. Even if only for a moment.


 

Chapter 12: When Understanding Becomes Another Trap

 

At some point, there was a subtle shift that became visible: even this whole process of trying to understand was taking a certain shape, and that shape itself had started behaving like a pattern. It did not feel wrong. In fact, it felt meaningful. But somewhere in between, there was a slight heaviness that started appearing. Almost like: ‘I need to figure this out.’

When something uncomfortable would happen, the mind would immediately go into understanding mode. Why is this happening? What pattern is this? On the surface, it looked like awareness. But sometimes it felt like another way of not just being with what was there — turning everything into something to be understood.

There is a certain satisfaction in understanding. When something becomes clear, there is a sense of relief. A feeling that something has been resolved. Even if the actual experience has not changed. This creates a subtle trap, because the mind starts chasing that clarity. But every time something is understood, something new appears. Another layer. Another question. The movement does not end.

The problem is not understanding itself. The problem is the dependency on it. The need for everything to make sense. Because life does not always present itself in a way that can be fully understood. There are things that remain unclear, incomplete, unresolved. And sometimes, that gap does not need to be filled.

But there were a few moments where this need to understand was not followed. Where something was unclear, and it was left that way. Not solved. Not defined. And those moments did not feel wrong. They felt open.

Understanding still happens. But it is not forced. Not chased. And maybe that is the difference. Not stopping understanding, but not depending on it completely. Because if every experience needs to be understood before it can be accepted, then acceptance never really happens.


 

Chapter 13: The Fear of Losing Myself

 

Somewhere along this whole movement of observing and questioning, a new kind of fear started appearing — not very loud, not always present, but noticeable enough. And it was not about anything outside. It was something more subtle: the fear of losing myself.

It showed up in smaller ways: sometimes as hesitation, sometimes as a slight resistance, sometimes as a pull to go back to something familiar. Because as things started becoming less fixed, the sense of ‘me’ also started becoming less solid. Earlier there was at least some idea of who I am — even if not completely accurate, it was something to hold onto. But now, with all this observation, that stability was not as strong.

There were moments where this felt freeing — not being fixed meant not being limited. But there were also moments where it felt uncomfortable. Almost like something was slipping. And this is where fear comes in. Not as panic, but as a subtle background question: ‘If I keep going like this, what will I become?’

There is a practical side to this too. Life still requires functioning. Decisions have to be made. Actions have to be taken. Those actions usually come from some sense of self, some identity. So if that identity becomes unclear, how does one function?

This also connects with something read before — that the sense of self we usually carry is not the final one, that what we call ‘I’ is often a combination of thoughts, memories, roles, and identifications (Upanishads). That something deeper is being pointed to beyond all this. But that idea, while it sounds meaningful, is not something that is fully experienced here. It remains more like a direction.

There were also moments where this fear was not there — where things were just happening, actions were happening, responses were happening, without constantly referring back to a defined ‘me’. But those moments did not stay.

At this point, it is not about resolving this fear. It is more about seeing it clearly — when it appears, how it appears, what it is connected to. Not removing the fear. Not overcoming it. But not ignoring it either. Just seeing that even the fear of losing myself is part of this whole movement. And like everything else, it also comes and goes.


 

Chapter 14: The Ordinary Moment

 

After moving through all these questions, loops, observations, confusions, and small glimpses of clarity, something unexpected started becoming visible — not something new, not something extraordinary, but something that was always there and somehow always overlooked. And that was the ordinary moment.

There was always a tendency to look for something more. More clarity. More silence. More understanding. Even when things became slightly clear, the mind would still move ahead, looking for the next thing. As if what is here right now is not enough.

But there were moments — not many — where this movement slowed down. Not because something was achieved, but simply because there was nothing particular happening. No strong thought. No strong emotion. No problem to solve. Just a normal moment. Earlier, these moments were ignored. Because they did not feel important. They were just ordinary.

But when looked at closely, there was something different about them. There was no pressure. No urgency. No need to become something else. Nothing was missing in that moment — even though nothing special was present. In that, there is a kind of ease. Not strong, not immediately noticeable. But there.

It is not something to hold onto — because the moment you try to hold it, it is no longer ordinary. It becomes something else. It is also not something that can be created, because it was always there. Just unnoticed.

This changes something slightly. The constant search for something more is not as strong all the time. Not because everything is understood or resolved. But because there is a glimpse that maybe not everything needs to be different. Life does not always have to feel intense to be complete. The ordinary moment appears, again and again, quietly, without asking for attention. And whether it is noticed or not, it remains.


 

Chapter 15: Nothing Stays

 

After everything that has been seen so far, one thing starts becoming difficult to ignore — not as an idea, but as something that keeps showing itself again and again. And that is this: nothing stays. Not thoughts. Not emotions. Not clarity. Not confusion. Not even the sense of understanding.

There were moments where things felt very clear, where the mind was quiet, where everything felt simple, almost settled. And in those moments, it felt like this might stay. But it did not stay. Without any clear reason, the same mind that was quiet became active again. Thoughts returned. Confusion returned.

The same happens with emotions. There are moments of attachment, intensity, longing — and they feel strong, almost permanent. But after some time, they reduce, they change, sometimes they disappear. And when they are gone, it becomes difficult to understand why they felt so strong.

This constant change creates a strange situation. Because the mind keeps trying to hold onto something stable. Something that can remain. But whatever is chosen, it changes. If a moment of silence comes, there is a subtle desire to continue it. But this effort itself creates movement. The moment there is an attempt to hold, there is already tension.

This makes it clear that maybe the problem is not that things change. Maybe the problem is the expectation that something should not change. Because change seems natural — everything that is being observed moves. So expecting stability from something that is constantly moving creates conflict.

There were also moments where things were changing, but there was no resistance to that change. A thought came and went, a feeling came and went, and there was no attempt to hold or push away. Those moments felt lighter. Not because something special was added, but because something unnecessary was not there.

Trying to find something permanent in what is constantly changing may not lead anywhere. The observation continues — not towards finding something that stays, but perhaps towards understanding this movement of change itself. And for now, that is where it remains.


 

Chapter 16: The Way I Loved

 

There were moments in life where connection did not feel like something I was doing — it just happened. Naturally, without effort. Attention going towards someone without trying. Caring without planning. And in those moments, it did not feel like something separate from me; it felt like it was just happening on its own.

It was not just about liking someone. There was a kind of involvement where their presence affected everything — the way the day felt, the way conversations happened, even the way I saw myself. And in that involvement, there was something that felt meaningful, like life had more depth than usual.

There was also a certain intensity in it — not always visible from outside, but very present inside. Small things mattered. And somewhere in all this, I started giving more importance to that connection than I probably realised at the time.

What started as something natural slowly became something I was holding onto. Not just the person. But the feeling. There was also expectation — not always spoken, not always clear, but present. A certain way things should be. And when things did not move in that direction, something inside reacted. At that time, it did not feel like expectation. It felt like care. But now, when I look at it, there was something more — a need.

The connection was not just with the other person — it was also shaping how I felt about myself. When things were good, everything felt good. When things were unclear, everything felt uncertain. And when things did not go the way I expected, the reaction was not just about the situation. It felt deeper. It felt personal.

There was also a tendency to hold on — to keep the connection alive through thinking, through remembering. But over time, it became clear that not everything stays the same. Connections change. People move. Situations shift. And when that happens, the intensity inside does not always reduce at the same speed.

Slowly, something becomes visible: that what is being held is not the person as they are now. It is the experience as it was. And that is different. Not fully gone. But not completely real in the present either. The way I loved was not just about the other person. It was also about how I held that experience. And how I continued to hold it even when it had already changed.


 

Chapter 17: When It Doesn't Come Back

 

After something has been felt deeply once, there is a quiet expectation that it should come back in the same way — not always as a clear thought, but as a background tendency. And when it does not happen like that, something feels off, even if everything looks normal from outside.

When something similar begins again, there is a subtle comparison that starts without being invited. The mind checks: does this feel the same? Is this as deep? And when it does not match exactly, there is a slight dissatisfaction that is difficult to explain.

There were moments where this became clearer: that what is being looked for is not the person in front. It is something from before. An experience. And because of that, the present does not get full attention — it is being measured.

There is also another layer: hope. Not always clear, but present. That maybe it will become like before. Maybe with time. Maybe with effort. And this hope keeps the mind engaged, keeps it thinking. But reality does not always move in that direction.

There is also a tendency to try to bring it back — through effort, through attention, through trying to understand the other person. But what is being tried to bring back is not something that can be recreated like that. Because it was not created intentionally in the first place. It just happened.

There is also something else: attachment not just to people, but to a certain version of experience. And that attachment makes it difficult to see what is actually here, because what is here is always being seen through what was.

Life does not repeat experiences — it moves. And what is here now is not a continuation of what was, but something else. Whether that is accepted or not is still not clear. But the seeing has started. And that itself changes something.


 

Chapter 18: Devotion Without Knowing

 

There were moments where connection did not feel like a choice — it felt like something that happened on its own. And in those moments, there was a kind of involvement that was deeper than usual. Not just liking, not just interest, but something that felt closer to devotion. Not devotion in a religious sense. But in the way importance was given. The way attention stayed.

In that state, giving did not feel like effort. Caring did not feel like doing something extra. It felt natural. There was also a kind of openness in it — less calculation, less control, more involvement. And in that involvement, there was something beautiful. Something that felt alive.

But at the same time, there was something else not clearly seen: that in giving so much attention, something inside was also becoming dependent. Not in a very obvious way, but subtly. The mood started depending on how things were going. When things were good, everything felt light. When things were unclear, everything felt disturbed.

There was also not much questioning in that devotion. Things were taken as they were, accepted as they were. And that felt good. But the lack of questioning also meant that certain things were not seen clearly. Patterns were not noticed. Expectations were not fully visible.

At some point, when things changed, the reaction was not just about that moment. It felt deeper. Because something that had been held with a lot of openness was now not in the same place. And then the mind started coming in, trying to understand. But what was being looked at was not just the situation — it was also the way I had been involved.

One thing becomes slightly visible: that devotion without awareness can easily become attachment. And attachment brings its own movement, its own loops, its own disturbances. This does not mean devotion is wrong. It only shows that when something is given importance without seeing clearly, it shapes the way everything else is experienced.


 

Chapter 19: The Pattern I Keep Repeating

 

After going through these experiences again and again — in different forms, with different people — something slowly started becoming visible. Not immediately, not as a clear conclusion, but as a pattern that keeps repeating. And that pattern was not outside. It was inside the way I was moving.

There was always a phase of natural connection where things flowed without effort. Then slowly, without clearly noticing, something would increase: the importance, the attention, the emotional investment. And along with that, expectation would come. Then there would be moments of uncertainty. And that is where the mind would start working more: thinking, analysing, trying to understand, trying to fix. And from there, the loop would begin.

At first, it always felt like the situation was different — that this time something would be different. But slowly, the similarity started becoming visible. Not in what was happening outside, but in how I was responding.

There was also a tendency to go deeper quickly. To invest early. To give importance before things are fully clear. And at that time, it did not feel wrong — it felt natural. But later, when things became uncertain, that same involvement would become a source of disturbance.

But at some point, seeing becomes clearer. That the pattern is not outside. It is about the way I move — the way I attach, the way I expect, the way I hold. And once this is seen, something changes slightly. The pattern does not disappear immediately. But it is no longer completely invisible.

Earlier, it was happening without being noticed. Now sometimes, it is seen while it is happening. And that creates a small gap — not enough to stop it completely, but enough to question it. Why am I going in the same direction again? What am I expecting? What am I holding? These questions do not stop the pattern immediately. But they slow it down. And maybe that is how change begins. Not by forcing something different. But by seeing clearly what is repeating.


 

Chapter 20: Where I Stand Now

 

After everything that has been seen so far — the thoughts, the loops, the body reactions, the silence, the confusion about truth, the movement of escape, the patterns in love, the repeating cycles — there is a natural question that comes, not as a conclusion but almost as a checkpoint: where do I stand now in all this?

It does not feel like I have reached something. There is no strong sense of ‘I understand everything now.’ In many ways, things feel more open than before. Less fixed. Less certain. Earlier, there were clearer assumptions — about myself, about others, about how things work. Now, those assumptions are not as strong.

The mind still moves. Thoughts still come. Loops still happen. Nothing has completely stopped. There are still moments of overthinking, still moments of getting caught, still moments of reacting without awareness. So in that sense, nothing is fully solved.

But something has changed. Earlier, most of this was happening without being seen. Now, at least sometimes, it is visible. The loop is seen. The body reaction is seen. The attachment is seen. The expectation is seen. Not always. But sometimes. And that ‘sometimes’ matters.

There is also less certainty about conclusions. Less tendency to say ‘this is the truth’ or ‘this is the way.’ Because every time something feels like a conclusion, something else appears that does not fit into it. There is also less confidence in the mind’s first reaction — sometimes there is a pause, a slight question: ‘Is this actually what is happening?’

There is also something else — a slight reduction in urgency. Earlier, there was a strong need to figure things out. Now, that need is still there, but not as strong all the time. Sometimes, things are just left as they are. Not solved. Not completed. And that does not always feel wrong.

So where do I stand now? Not at an answer. Not at an end. But somewhere in between. Seeing some things. Missing some things. Understanding some parts. Confused about others. Moving — not in a fixed direction. Just moving. And for now, that seems to be where it is.


 

Chapter 21: Not a Conclusion

 

There is a natural tendency to end things properly — to conclude, to summarise, to arrive somewhere clear after going through so much. But sitting here after all this, it does not feel like something has ended. It feels more like something has opened, and is still open.

There is no final clarity. No statement that feels complete. No understanding that holds in all situations. If anything, what has reduced is the confidence in quick conclusions. Whatever is understood feels partial. Temporary. Context-based.

There are still moments of confusion. Still moments of getting caught in thought. Still moments of emotional involvement. Nothing has completely disappeared. But there is a slight shift in how things are seen. Thoughts are not always taken as truth. Feelings are not always taken as final. Reactions are not always followed immediately. Not always. But sometimes.

There is also less urgency. Less pressure to figure everything out. Less need to reach a final answer. Not because answers are not important. But because it is seen that answers do not stay.

There are still questions about truth, about self, about how to live. But those questions are no longer demanding immediate answers. They remain open. There is no clear identity formed out of all this. Not someone who knows. Not someone who has understood. Just someone who is seeing a little more clearly at times. And missing it at other times.

So this is not a conclusion. Because nothing has concluded. It is more like a pause — a place where things are left as they are. Not solved. Not completed. Just seen, as much as they can be seen right now. What comes next is not clear. And maybe it does not need to be. So this is not an ending. It is just where things are, at this moment. Unfinished. Open.


 

The Act of Slowing Down

 

There is something very subtle that I started noticing: the mind that overthinks is not alone. The body also starts living in the same pattern — walking fast, eating fast, talking fast, thinking fast. Everything becomes a rush. And when the body lives in constant hurry, the mind never learns to slow down.

We keep looking for peace outside — in places, in people, in situations. But there is no place in this world that can give you permanent peace. Peace is not outside. It is the state of your system.

When you slow down your body, you are not just slowing movement. You are sending a signal to your nervous system: ‘There is no danger. Everything is okay. You can relax.’

And slowly, something starts changing. The breath becomes deeper. The body becomes lighter. The mind becomes less reactive. This is not something dramatic. It is very simple. Walk a little slower. Eat a little slower. Sit without rushing. Breathe without forcing.

And in that slowing down, a different quality appears — a quietness. And once that quietness is within you, it does not depend on where you are. Wherever you go, that peace goes with you. You do not find peace in places. You carry it.

If your body is rushed, your mind will be rushed. If your body learns to slow down, your mind slowly follows. And maybe this is where peace begins. Not by searching more. But by slowing down.


 

 

 


 

Chapter 1: The First Disturbance

 

It did not begin with understanding. It began with something being off.

There was no clear reason for it. Nothing dramatic happened. Life, from the outside, was moving normally. Conversations were happening. Work was going on. People were around. Nothing was missing in a visible way.

Yet something inside did not sit right.

It was not sadness. It was not exactly anxiety. It was not even confusion in the usual sense. It was more like a constant background noise.

Something was always running. Even in moments where everything should have been calm, there was movement inside — not physical movement, but mental. A kind of inner activity that did not stop.

At first, it was ignored. Like most things are. Because it did not demand attention strongly. It was subtle. Manageable. Easy to distract from.

But over time, it became more visible. Not because it became stronger, but because I started noticing it.

It started with small observations. Sitting alone, and suddenly realising that the mind is not quiet. There is always something: a replay of something that already happened, a preparation for something that has not happened, an imagined conversation, a response to a question nobody asked.

And it was not occasional. It was continuous.

One moment it was about the past — revisiting something that had already ended. Not just remembering it, but modifying it. ‘What if I had said this instead?’ ‘What if that moment had gone differently?’ Even when I knew clearly that nothing could be changed, the mind kept trying, as if it had the power to rewrite reality.

Another moment, it shifted to the future. Not planning in a practical way, but preparing mentally for situations that may never happen. Someone asking a question. Someone judging. Someone misunderstanding. And I would start answering, explaining, defending — all inside my own head.

This was strange. Because there was no real situation. Yet the body was reacting. The heart rate would change. There would be a slight tension, a sense of alertness, as if something important was actually happening.

This is where the first crack appeared. A simple but uncomfortable question: if nothing is happening outside, then why is so much happening inside?

At first, I thought this was normal — that everyone must be like this. And maybe that is true. But that did not answer the real question. Normal does not mean understood.

The more I observed, the more I saw a pattern. The mind does not stay empty. It fills itself. If there is no real input, it creates its own. And once it creates, it starts believing.

There was also something else — a very subtle attachment to these thoughts. Even when they were uncomfortable, there was a tendency to stay with them, to keep thinking, to go deeper. Almost as if stopping them was not even considered.

It was not just about thoughts. The body was involved. A thought about something stressful would create a physical reaction. And that physical reaction would make the thought feel more real. Then the mind would say: ‘See, this is important.’ And the cycle would continue.

Slowly, it became clear that this was not random. There was a structure to it — a loop. A thought appears. The body reacts. The reaction confirms the thought. And the thought becomes stronger.

Once this was seen, something shifted. Not solved. Not removed. But seen. And that changes something. Because before this, everything felt like one single experience. Now, there was a small distance — a slight separation between what is happening and the one noticing it.

This separation was not stable. Sometimes it was there. Sometimes it disappeared. Sometimes I was fully inside the thought. Sometimes I could watch it. But once you see something even once, you cannot completely unsee it.

And that is how it started — not with truth, not with realisation, but with a disturbance. A quiet noticing that something inside is always moving.


 

Chapter 2: The Loop

 

After the first disturbance was noticed, it did not take long to see that it was not just random noise. There was a pattern to it. At first, it looked like thoughts coming and going, as they always do. But when seen closely, it was not that simple. Thoughts were not just appearing and disappearing. They were building something, and that something was repeating.

A thought would appear — sometimes very small, almost harmless. It could be about something that had already happened or something that might happen. On its own, it did not seem powerful. But the moment attention went to it, something changed. The body started reacting: a slight tightening in the chest, a small shift in breathing, a faint sense of alertness. Nothing extreme, but enough to be felt.

Then something strange would happen. The body’s reaction would not stay separate — it would feed the thought. The mind would look at the sensation and interpret it: ‘If the body is reacting, this must be important.’ That one conclusion was enough to give the thought weight. It was no longer just a passing idea. It had become something real — something that needed to be understood, solved, or controlled.

Once it reached that stage, it did not stop. The mind would start expanding it. One thought would lead to another, and then another. The situation would become more detailed, more intense. Conversations would be imagined. Outcomes would be predicted. Problems would be created and then attempts to solve them would follow — all of this without anything actually occurring outside.

At the same time, the body kept responding. The more the thought expanded, the more the body reacted. The more the body reacted, the more the mind believed the thought. It became a closed system — thought influencing body, body confirming thought — with no external check, no interruption, just a continuous loop feeding itself.

The most confusing part was that it felt real. Not logically real, but experientially real. Even when there was an awareness that nothing was actually happening, the feeling did not match that understanding. The body does not care about logic; it responds to what is being experienced internally. So even an imagined situation could create real stress, real fear, real discomfort.

At some point, the loop would become exhausting. There would be a moment of stepping back — either out of awareness or simply tiredness — and suddenly everything would drop. The same thought that felt so heavy a few minutes ago would lose its intensity. The body would calm down. The urgency would disappear. And then a strange realisation would come: nothing had actually happened.

But this did not stop the loop from forming again. It would come back in a different form. Different thought, same structure. Different story, same pattern. It did not matter what the content was — whether it was about the past, the future, a person, a mistake, or a possibility. The mechanism remained the same.

Over time, it became clear that the problem was not any specific thought. Removing one thought did not change anything, because another one would take its place. The mind was not dependent on a particular topic — it only needed something to hold onto. Once it found something, it would build on it.

There was also a subtle pull to stay inside the loop. Even when it was uncomfortable, there was a kind of involvement in it. It was not forced — it was almost voluntary, but not consciously chosen. It felt like being drawn in, with attention constantly returning to the same thought as if trying to resolve it. But resolution never came.

This created another layer of confusion. If it is uncomfortable, why not leave it? If it is clearly not useful, why stay in it? There was no clear answer, because it did not feel like a decision — it felt automatic.

At some point, a different kind of observation began. Instead of focusing on the thought itself, the focus shifted to the process — not ‘what am I thinking?’ but ‘what is happening right now?’ And in that shift, the structure of the loop became more visible.

The moment attention stayed on a thought, the loop started. The moment attention moved away — even slightly — the loop weakened. It did not disappear instantly, but it lost its force. The connection between thought and body was not permanent; it was being maintained through attention.

This did not mean control. Thoughts still appeared, and it was not possible to simply stop them. But there was a difference between a thought appearing and a thought being followed. That small difference started to matter.

Gradually, a simple understanding formed — not as a conclusion, but as something directly observed. The mind creates, the body reacts, and together they convince each other. It is not one controlling the other; it is a cycle. And once seen, the question changed. It was no longer ‘how do I stop this?’ but ‘is it necessary to stay in it?’

The loop did not disappear. But it was no longer completely invisible. And that made all the difference.


 

Chapter 3: The Pull Towards Silence

 

After noticing the loop again and again, something else started happening — not planned, not even intentional. It came as a natural response. The more the mind was seen in this repetitive movement, the more there arose a quiet desire to step away from it. Not out of rejection or frustration, but more like a simple feeling: there must be something beyond this constant noise.

It was not a dramatic thought. It was softer — almost like a background pull. A curiosity mixed with tiredness. If the mind keeps running like this, creating loops and reacting to its own creations, then what is there when this stops? Or does it ever stop?

There were moments — very small ones — where the mind was not actively involved in anything. No strong thought, no emotional pull, no inner conversation. Just a kind of stillness. These moments were not created; they came on their own. And they did not stay for long. But something about them felt different. Not exciting. Not emotional. Just quiet. And strangely, in that quiet, nothing was missing.

The moment the mind noticed the silence, it would come back almost immediately, as if it could not tolerate that emptiness for too long. It would bring a thought — any thought — just to fill the space again. And then the usual process would start. But now there was a contrast.

Earlier, everything felt the same because there was no reference. Now there were two different experiences: the constant movement of the mind, and that brief stillness. And because both were seen, a question naturally followed — what is more real? The noise that keeps changing, or the silence that does not try to become anything?

This is where reading started to connect — not as belief, but as comparison. When I came across ideas from the Upanishads, especially the Mandukya Upanishad, they did not feel completely abstract. They spoke about states — waking, dreaming, deep sleep, and something beyond. Earlier, this had sounded like philosophy. But now, in a very small way, it felt relatable.

There was also this idea that what we usually experience is not the full picture — that there is something underlying all states, something that is not constantly changing the way thoughts and emotions do. I could not say I experienced that clearly, but the direction made sense. Because whatever I was observing inside myself was always changing. If something is always changing, can that be the final thing?

At the same time, there was another pull — a more practical one. Life was still happening: work, people, conversations, responsibilities. And even if I tried to think about only exploring silence, something inside did not fully agree. Because the same mind that wanted silence was also getting involved in life. This created a kind of inner contradiction.

This is where the question about detachment became stronger. Not as an idea from books, but as a personal confusion. If silence feels real in those brief moments, should everything else be reduced? Or is that another movement of the mind trying to escape something it does not understand?

Even when reading the Bhagavad Gita, it did not offer a simple conclusion. On one side, there is talk of detachment — of not being affected by outcomes. On the other side, there is action: not withdrawal, but participation; not leaving the battlefield, but standing in it.

These questions did not resolve anything immediately. But they changed the direction of looking. It was no longer just about stopping thoughts or escaping the loop. It became something deeper — understanding the place of both movement and stillness. The small glimpses of silence continued to appear, and disappear. They did not become stable. But they left an impression — not as something to chase, but as something that exists without effort. And that was enough to keep the question alive. Not answered. Just alive.


 

Chapter 4: The Conflict of Two Directions

 

As the observation deepened, one thing became more visible than before — not just the loop of thoughts or the occasional silence, but something more constant, something that stayed in the background of everything. A kind of inner conflict. Not loud. Not always disturbing. But present.

On one side, there was a pull towards silence. Those small gaps where nothing was running inside had a different quality — they did not excite, but they also did not disturb. There was no effort in them, no trying to become anything. Just a simple sense of being there without movement.

On the other side, life was still moving. Conversations, work, relationships, responsibilities. Situations that required attention, involvement, and decision. The mind had to function — think, respond, act. There was no way to stay completely withdrawn and still participate.

This created a strange position. Because both seemed valid. Silence felt true in one way. Involvement felt necessary in another. And the difficulty was not in choosing one over the other — it was that both were happening together.

At times, there was a desire to move away from everything — not out of hatred, but a quiet thought: if I reduce involvement, maybe the mind will become quieter. But at the same time, situations will come. People will come. Responsibilities will remain. And avoiding them does not feel like clarity — it feels incomplete.

In the Bhagavad Gita, there is the idea that action cannot be avoided, that even not acting is a form of action, and more importantly, that the focus is not on leaving action but on how action is performed (Bhagavad Gita 3.5). This shifted the question slightly. Maybe the problem is not the action itself. Maybe the problem is something within action.

There was also a repeated emphasis on detachment — not being affected by results, not getting lost in outcomes (Bhagavad Gita 2.47). But what does that actually mean in experience? Because when something happens, the reaction is immediate. Emotions come, thoughts come, the body responds. Detachment cannot simply mean becoming insensitive.

And slowly it became visible that the disturbance is not in the action itself — it is in the attachment to what comes from it. The mind does not just act; it also projects. It imagines results, creates expectations, holds onto possibilities. And when those do not match reality, disturbance comes.

So the conflict was not just between silence and action. It was also between expectation and reality. Even in moments of silence, if there was a subtle expectation — this should stay, this should deepen — that itself created movement. And in action, if there was a constant pull towards outcome, the action was never complete in itself.

This is where another kind of seeing started — not choosing silence over action, not choosing action over silence, but noticing how the mind moves in both. Both movements come from the same place: the mind trying to find stability. But stability does not seem to come from either. The question was no longer ‘which path is right?’ but: is it possible to live without dividing these two?


 

Chapter 5: Can I Trust What I Feel?

 

At some point, the problem was no longer just thoughts — not even the loop. Something more unsettling started to appear. It was the realisation that even my own experience might not be fully reliable.

Many times, the body was already in a certain state before any clear thought appeared. There would be a sudden uneasiness — no reason, no story, just a shift in the body. And almost immediately, the mind would try to explain it. It would search for a cause: something from the past, something about the future, something about a person. It did not matter what it picked — it just needed something to attach to.

But when seen carefully, that connection did not always feel true. The body reacted first. The mind explained later. This created a crack in something very basic — the idea that what I feel must be correct. Because if the body can react without a clear reason, and the mind can create a reason afterwards, then how much of what I feel is actually real?

There were moments where this became very visible. A sudden tension would appear in the body, and the mind would immediately say: something is wrong. Within seconds, a full story would form around it. But if attention stayed without jumping into the story, the sensation would slowly change. Sometimes it would even disappear without any explanation. Just gone.

Then the question came: if it can disappear on its own, was it ever pointing to something real? Or was it just a reaction passing through? This did not mean that everything is false. There are real situations, real emotions, real consequences. The confusion was not about denying reality — it was about seeing that not everything that feels real is actually pointing to something outside.

There were also moments where the reaction itself became the problem. The discomfort of it, the uneasiness of it. And then another thought would come: ‘Why is this happening?’ or ‘This should not be happening.’ Now it was no longer just a reaction — it had become resistance to the reaction. And that made it stronger.

So there are layers: a sensation, then a thought explaining it, then another thought resisting it. And all of this feels like one single experience. But when seen slowly, they are different.

This introduced doubt — not in a negative way, but in a clarifying way. Doubt about immediate conclusions. Doubt about the first explanation that comes. And in that doubt, there is a small space. Less certain. And that uncertainty, in some moments, feels more honest than false certainty. The body reacts. The mind explains. And somewhere in between, something watches. Not always. But sometimes. And those moments are enough to keep looking.


 

Chapter 6: The Memory of Love

 

Not all loops come from fear. Some come from something that once felt very real, very alive, and very complete — and those loops are harder to see clearly, because they do not feel like disturbance in the beginning. They feel like something valuable, something worth holding.

There were moments where connection with someone did not feel like effort — it was just there, naturally. Attention going towards them without trying. Thinking about them without forcing it. Wanting to share things, wanting to be seen by them. And somewhere in that, there was a sense of meaning, as though something in life had more depth than usual.

Without realising it, the mind started attaching not just to the person, but to the way it felt to be with them. The way it felt to be understood. The way it felt to be important in someone’s life. At that time, it did not look like attachment — it just felt natural. Like this is how things should be.

But slowly something started changing. Not immediately, not dramatically — just small shifts. Conversations reduced, energy changed, misunderstandings happened. And while all this was happening outside, something inside did not move at the same speed. The mind did not accept that the experience was changing. It kept holding onto what had been — replaying moments again and again. And in that replay, the experience almost felt alive again, even though it was not happening now.

This is where a different kind of loop started forming. Not like the earlier ones about fear or anxiety — this one was quieter but deeper. It was not trying to solve anything; it was trying to hold something, to keep it alive in some form. And there was also a subtle hope inside it: that maybe it could happen again. Maybe with the same person, maybe with someone else, but the same feeling, the same intensity.

Without noticing it clearly, the mind was not just remembering — it was comparing. Everything new was being seen through the lens of what had already happened. And because of that, nothing felt quite enough. Something always felt missing.

There were also moments where the mind went into the past not just to remember, but to change it — thinking about what could have been done differently. As if by thinking about it enough times, something might shift. But nothing changed. The situation was already over. Yet it continued inside, creating a strange state where memory, imagination, and longing all existed together.

At the same time, this was not something that could simply be dropped. Letting go felt like losing something important, even if that thing was no longer actually present. One part could see that holding on was creating disturbance, while another part did not want to let go. Because letting go felt like ending something completely.

Even after seeing all this, the pull does not disappear completely. The memories still come. The feelings still arise. But perhaps there is a small difference: earlier it all felt like the present; now sometimes it is seen as something being replayed. Just enough to notice that what is being held is not actually here anymore. And maybe that is where something begins to loosen. Not forced. Not decided. Just slowly, through seeing.


 

Chapter 7: The Many Versions of Me

 

At some point, the question was no longer just about thoughts or emotions. It slowly turned towards something more direct and uncomfortable: who exactly is the one going through all of this? Because the more I started looking, the less stable this ‘me’ felt. It did not feel like one solid thing — it felt like something that keeps changing depending on the situation, the person, the mood, even the time of day.

There are moments where I feel very clear, almost as though I understand things. And then there are moments where all of that disappears completely, and I am fully inside reactions, inside emotions, inside confusion. Both of these feel like me. But they are completely different from each other. And this is not just two versions — there are many.

With one person I behave in one way; with another, completely differently. In one situation I feel confident; in another, uncertain. In one moment I want silence; in another, I want connection. All of these feel real when they are happening. But when I look at them together, they do not form one clear identity — they contradict each other.

This creates a strange question: which one is actually me? The one who wants to be alone, or the one who wants to be with someone? The one who understands things, or the one who gets completely lost? There is no clear answer, because each version feels true when it appears.

There is also the identity given by the world — the name, the role, the work, the way others see me. Different people see different things. For one person I am understanding; for another, careless. For one I am important; for another, just another person. None of these is fully wrong, but none of them feels complete either.

Then there is the identity I create for myself — the story I tell myself. But even that keeps changing. Sometimes I feel like someone who is searching, trying to understand. Sometimes I feel like I am just confused, going in circles.

This is where something from the Upanishads starts to come into the picture again — not as something believed, but as something that connects slightly with what is being seen. The idea that what we usually identify as ‘self’ is not the complete picture; that there is something beyond the waking, dreaming, and deep sleep states (Mandukya Upanishad). While this is not fully understood, it creates a direction of looking.

At some point, a simple observation becomes clear: ‘me’ is not one thing. It is a collection of movements — thoughts, emotions, reactions, roles — all appearing and disappearing. And depending on which one is active, that becomes ‘me’ in that moment. The search is no longer about defining ‘me’ in a fixed way. It becomes more about watching how ‘me’ keeps forming and dissolving. Not defined. But seen.


 

Chapter 8: What Is Truth Then?

 

At some point, after looking at thoughts, loops, silence, body reactions, love, and even the shifting sense of ‘me’, a different kind of question started coming up — not about a specific experience, but about something more fundamental: what is actually true in all of this? Everything that is seen keeps changing. So if everything is changing, what can be called truth?

This question did not come from reading alone — it came from seeing contradiction. Not just in myself, but in what others have said. Different masters say different things, sometimes even opposite things. One says the world is illusion; another says the world is real but misunderstood. One says leave everything; another says live fully. All of them sound convincing in their own way.

This creates a confusion — not about who is right or wrong, but about the nature of truth itself. Because if truth is one, why are there so many different expressions of it?

There was a time when it felt like finding the right teaching would solve everything. But now it does not feel that simple, because even in those texts there are layers, different interpretations, different ways of understanding the same thing. And what I understand today might change tomorrow.

When reading about silence being the ultimate, it feels true in moments where the mind is quiet. But when life becomes active, that same statement feels incomplete. And when reading about action and duty, it feels relevant in daily life. But when sitting alone, it feels as though there is something beyond action. So both seem true in different moments — but not complete on their own.

There is also a line that becomes clearer over time — not as a belief, but as something that feels reasonable: truth does not need a perfect messenger, and no messenger deserves complete surrender. Because if something is true, it should stand on its own, not on the authority of who said it.

So the approach slowly changes — from trying to find truth somewhere outside, to observing what is happening directly. Not rejecting teachings, but not depending on them completely either. Using them as pointers, not as conclusions. The question ‘what is truth?’ remains open. Not answered. Not concluded. Because any answer given too quickly starts becoming another belief.


 

Chapter 9: The Two Ways of Living

 

At some point, after moving through all these observations, one question kept coming back in a very practical way: how should I live? Because whatever is being seen inside does not stay limited to thinking — it starts affecting choices, actions, direction, and the way everyday life feels.

There seem to be two very different directions. One is to move away from everything — reduce involvement, reduce noise, reduce desire — and slowly go towards silence. The other is to stay in life fully. To work, to build relationships, to experience things, to respond to situations, to take responsibility.

The difficulty is that both directions seem valid. There are moments where stepping back feels right — where silence feels more real than anything else. And there are moments where that same idea feels incomplete, almost like an escape.

The distinction becomes clearer when looking at it through what has been read. There is the path of the yogi, who leaves, who reduces, who moves towards the inner completely. And there is the path of the householder, who stays, who participates, who lives within the world. Both are valid — but they are not the same. A yogi can afford to step away. A householder cannot, at least not completely.

This is where the confusion was earlier — trying to apply one path to another kind of life. Trying to live in the world, but also trying to function like someone who has left it. That creates imbalance, because the expectations do not match the situation.

There is also something from the Bhagavad Gita that keeps coming back — that action is unavoidable, and that what matters is not avoiding action but how one relates to it (Bhagavad Gita 3.5). And also the idea of not being completely tied to outcomes (Bhagavad Gita 2.47).

A simple observation starts forming: whatever role is being played in the moment requires full presence. If working, then working fully. If talking to someone, then being there fully. And at the same time, not carrying that role beyond its time, not making it the whole identity. Because the problem is not the role itself. The problem is becoming the role.

Running away from life in the name of detachment creates its own conflict. And getting lost in life without awareness creates another. So neither extreme seems complete. It is not about defining the right path. It is more about seeing clearly what is happening in each direction. And slowly, through that, something may settle on its own. Not decided. Not forced. But understood through living.


 

Chapter 10: The Desire to Escape

 

At some point, it became difficult to ignore a very subtle but strong movement inside — something present in different forms across all these observations. And that was the desire to escape. Not always clearly visible, not always admitted, but present: sometimes appearing as a search for silence, sometimes as a need for clarity. But underneath all of that, there was a common direction — moving away from what feels uncomfortable.

It did not look like escape in the beginning. It looked like seeking — seeking truth, seeking peace, seeking understanding. But when seen more honestly, there were moments where this seeking was not coming from clarity, but from discomfort. From not wanting to feel certain things. From not wanting to stay with certain experiences.

For example, when the mind became too noisy, the immediate pull was towards silence. On the surface, this looked like a movement towards something deeper. But at the same time, there was also a sense that it was a reaction to discomfort. Not always. But sometimes.

There is also another form of escape that is less obvious — escaping into thinking. When something feels uncomfortable, instead of directly feeling it, the mind starts analysing, understanding, breaking it down. This feels like progress. But sometimes it is just another way of not staying with the actual experience. Even the search for truth can become an escape.

This does not mean that seeking is wrong, or that silence is not valid. It only shows that the intention behind it is not always clear. This creates another layer of observation — not just what I am doing, but why I am doing it.

And slowly, a pattern starts becoming visible. The mind does not like discomfort. It moves away from it — in different directions. Sometimes towards pleasure. Sometimes towards understanding. Sometimes towards silence. But the movement is the same: away from what is.

Seeing it changes something — not completely, but slightly. Because earlier, the movement felt like the right thing to do. Now sometimes, it is seen as a reaction. And in those moments, there is a small pause. Where nothing is done immediately. No escape. No solution. Just the discomfort. Those moments are not comfortable. But they are direct. Not moving away. Not fixing. Just being with what is there.


 

Chapter 11: Staying With What Is

 

After seeing the movement of escape in different forms, there were moments where something slightly different started happening — not as a practice, not as a decision, but almost as a consequence of seeing. Instead of immediately moving away from what felt uncomfortable, there was sometimes a pause. A small gap where nothing was done. And in that gap, the usual patterns did not start immediately.

This was not something stable. Most of the time, the old movement continued. But sometimes, just sometimes, there was a moment where the reaction was seen early enough, and instead of following it, there was just staying. Not trying to change it. Not trying to understand it. Not trying to escape it. Just staying with it.

This is not as simple as it sounds. Because when discomfort is there, the natural tendency is to move — to fix, to reduce, to distract. So staying feels almost unnatural.

There were also moments where this happened with body sensations. A sudden uneasiness, a tightness, a restlessness. Earlier, this would immediately turn into a problem. But in some moments, that chain did not fully form. The sensation was there, but it was not immediately converted into something else. And something unexpected happened: the sensation changed on its own. Without being solved. Without being understood. It came, stayed, and then slowly reduced.

Staying can easily turn into another form of doing — trying to stay, forcing attention, making it into a method. And the moment that happens, it becomes another effort, another control. So even here, there is something to watch: whether staying is natural, or whether it is being forced.

Those moments of natural staying are not special. They do not feel like realisation. They are very ordinary. But in those ordinary moments, something is slightly different. There is no rush. No immediate need to change anything. And maybe that is enough for now — not a solution, not an end, just a different way of being with what is already there. Without moving away immediately. Just staying. Even if only for a moment.


 

Chapter 12: When Understanding Becomes Another Trap

 

At some point, there was a subtle shift that became visible: even this whole process of trying to understand was taking a certain shape, and that shape itself had started behaving like a pattern. It did not feel wrong. In fact, it felt meaningful. But somewhere in between, there was a slight heaviness that started appearing. Almost like: ‘I need to figure this out.’

When something uncomfortable would happen, the mind would immediately go into understanding mode. Why is this happening? What pattern is this? On the surface, it looked like awareness. But sometimes it felt like another way of not just being with what was there — turning everything into something to be understood.

There is a certain satisfaction in understanding. When something becomes clear, there is a sense of relief. A feeling that something has been resolved. Even if the actual experience has not changed. This creates a subtle trap, because the mind starts chasing that clarity. But every time something is understood, something new appears. Another layer. Another question. The movement does not end.

The problem is not understanding itself. The problem is the dependency on it. The need for everything to make sense. Because life does not always present itself in a way that can be fully understood. There are things that remain unclear, incomplete, unresolved. And sometimes, that gap does not need to be filled.

But there were a few moments where this need to understand was not followed. Where something was unclear, and it was left that way. Not solved. Not defined. And those moments did not feel wrong. They felt open.

Understanding still happens. But it is not forced. Not chased. And maybe that is the difference. Not stopping understanding, but not depending on it completely. Because if every experience needs to be understood before it can be accepted, then acceptance never really happens.


 

Chapter 13: The Fear of Losing Myself

 

Somewhere along this whole movement of observing and questioning, a new kind of fear started appearing — not very loud, not always present, but noticeable enough. And it was not about anything outside. It was something more subtle: the fear of losing myself.

It showed up in smaller ways: sometimes as hesitation, sometimes as a slight resistance, sometimes as a pull to go back to something familiar. Because as things started becoming less fixed, the sense of ‘me’ also started becoming less solid. Earlier there was at least some idea of who I am — even if not completely accurate, it was something to hold onto. But now, with all this observation, that stability was not as strong.

There were moments where this felt freeing — not being fixed meant not being limited. But there were also moments where it felt uncomfortable. Almost like something was slipping. And this is where fear comes in. Not as panic, but as a subtle background question: ‘If I keep going like this, what will I become?’

There is a practical side to this too. Life still requires functioning. Decisions have to be made. Actions have to be taken. Those actions usually come from some sense of self, some identity. So if that identity becomes unclear, how does one function?

This also connects with something read before — that the sense of self we usually carry is not the final one, that what we call ‘I’ is often a combination of thoughts, memories, roles, and identifications (Upanishads). That something deeper is being pointed to beyond all this. But that idea, while it sounds meaningful, is not something that is fully experienced here. It remains more like a direction.

There were also moments where this fear was not there — where things were just happening, actions were happening, responses were happening, without constantly referring back to a defined ‘me’. But those moments did not stay.

At this point, it is not about resolving this fear. It is more about seeing it clearly — when it appears, how it appears, what it is connected to. Not removing the fear. Not overcoming it. But not ignoring it either. Just seeing that even the fear of losing myself is part of this whole movement. And like everything else, it also comes and goes.


 

Chapter 14: The Ordinary Moment

 

After moving through all these questions, loops, observations, confusions, and small glimpses of clarity, something unexpected started becoming visible — not something new, not something extraordinary, but something that was always there and somehow always overlooked. And that was the ordinary moment.

There was always a tendency to look for something more. More clarity. More silence. More understanding. Even when things became slightly clear, the mind would still move ahead, looking for the next thing. As if what is here right now is not enough.

But there were moments — not many — where this movement slowed down. Not because something was achieved, but simply because there was nothing particular happening. No strong thought. No strong emotion. No problem to solve. Just a normal moment. Earlier, these moments were ignored. Because they did not feel important. They were just ordinary.

But when looked at closely, there was something different about them. There was no pressure. No urgency. No need to become something else. Nothing was missing in that moment — even though nothing special was present. In that, there is a kind of ease. Not strong, not immediately noticeable. But there.

It is not something to hold onto — because the moment you try to hold it, it is no longer ordinary. It becomes something else. It is also not something that can be created, because it was always there. Just unnoticed.

This changes something slightly. The constant search for something more is not as strong all the time. Not because everything is understood or resolved. But because there is a glimpse that maybe not everything needs to be different. Life does not always have to feel intense to be complete. The ordinary moment appears, again and again, quietly, without asking for attention. And whether it is noticed or not, it remains.


 

Chapter 15: Nothing Stays

 

After everything that has been seen so far, one thing starts becoming difficult to ignore — not as an idea, but as something that keeps showing itself again and again. And that is this: nothing stays. Not thoughts. Not emotions. Not clarity. Not confusion. Not even the sense of understanding.

There were moments where things felt very clear, where the mind was quiet, where everything felt simple, almost settled. And in those moments, it felt like this might stay. But it did not stay. Without any clear reason, the same mind that was quiet became active again. Thoughts returned. Confusion returned.

The same happens with emotions. There are moments of attachment, intensity, longing — and they feel strong, almost permanent. But after some time, they reduce, they change, sometimes they disappear. And when they are gone, it becomes difficult to understand why they felt so strong.

This constant change creates a strange situation. Because the mind keeps trying to hold onto something stable. Something that can remain. But whatever is chosen, it changes. If a moment of silence comes, there is a subtle desire to continue it. But this effort itself creates movement. The moment there is an attempt to hold, there is already tension.

This makes it clear that maybe the problem is not that things change. Maybe the problem is the expectation that something should not change. Because change seems natural — everything that is being observed moves. So expecting stability from something that is constantly moving creates conflict.

There were also moments where things were changing, but there was no resistance to that change. A thought came and went, a feeling came and went, and there was no attempt to hold or push away. Those moments felt lighter. Not because something special was added, but because something unnecessary was not there.

Trying to find something permanent in what is constantly changing may not lead anywhere. The observation continues — not towards finding something that stays, but perhaps towards understanding this movement of change itself. And for now, that is where it remains.


 

Chapter 16: The Way I Loved

 

There were moments in life where connection did not feel like something I was doing — it just happened. Naturally, without effort. Attention going towards someone without trying. Caring without planning. And in those moments, it did not feel like something separate from me; it felt like it was just happening on its own.

It was not just about liking someone. There was a kind of involvement where their presence affected everything — the way the day felt, the way conversations happened, even the way I saw myself. And in that involvement, there was something that felt meaningful, like life had more depth than usual.

There was also a certain intensity in it — not always visible from outside, but very present inside. Small things mattered. And somewhere in all this, I started giving more importance to that connection than I probably realised at the time.

What started as something natural slowly became something I was holding onto. Not just the person. But the feeling. There was also expectation — not always spoken, not always clear, but present. A certain way things should be. And when things did not move in that direction, something inside reacted. At that time, it did not feel like expectation. It felt like care. But now, when I look at it, there was something more — a need.

The connection was not just with the other person — it was also shaping how I felt about myself. When things were good, everything felt good. When things were unclear, everything felt uncertain. And when things did not go the way I expected, the reaction was not just about the situation. It felt deeper. It felt personal.

There was also a tendency to hold on — to keep the connection alive through thinking, through remembering. But over time, it became clear that not everything stays the same. Connections change. People move. Situations shift. And when that happens, the intensity inside does not always reduce at the same speed.

Slowly, something becomes visible: that what is being held is not the person as they are now. It is the experience as it was. And that is different. Not fully gone. But not completely real in the present either. The way I loved was not just about the other person. It was also about how I held that experience. And how I continued to hold it even when it had already changed.


 

Chapter 17: When It Doesn't Come Back

 

After something has been felt deeply once, there is a quiet expectation that it should come back in the same way — not always as a clear thought, but as a background tendency. And when it does not happen like that, something feels off, even if everything looks normal from outside.

When something similar begins again, there is a subtle comparison that starts without being invited. The mind checks: does this feel the same? Is this as deep? And when it does not match exactly, there is a slight dissatisfaction that is difficult to explain.

There were moments where this became clearer: that what is being looked for is not the person in front. It is something from before. An experience. And because of that, the present does not get full attention — it is being measured.

There is also another layer: hope. Not always clear, but present. That maybe it will become like before. Maybe with time. Maybe with effort. And this hope keeps the mind engaged, keeps it thinking. But reality does not always move in that direction.

There is also a tendency to try to bring it back — through effort, through attention, through trying to understand the other person. But what is being tried to bring back is not something that can be recreated like that. Because it was not created intentionally in the first place. It just happened.

There is also something else: attachment not just to people, but to a certain version of experience. And that attachment makes it difficult to see what is actually here, because what is here is always being seen through what was.

Life does not repeat experiences — it moves. And what is here now is not a continuation of what was, but something else. Whether that is accepted or not is still not clear. But the seeing has started. And that itself changes something.


 

Chapter 18: Devotion Without Knowing

 

There were moments where connection did not feel like a choice — it felt like something that happened on its own. And in those moments, there was a kind of involvement that was deeper than usual. Not just liking, not just interest, but something that felt closer to devotion. Not devotion in a religious sense. But in the way importance was given. The way attention stayed.

In that state, giving did not feel like effort. Caring did not feel like doing something extra. It felt natural. There was also a kind of openness in it — less calculation, less control, more involvement. And in that involvement, there was something beautiful. Something that felt alive.

But at the same time, there was something else not clearly seen: that in giving so much attention, something inside was also becoming dependent. Not in a very obvious way, but subtly. The mood started depending on how things were going. When things were good, everything felt light. When things were unclear, everything felt disturbed.

There was also not much questioning in that devotion. Things were taken as they were, accepted as they were. And that felt good. But the lack of questioning also meant that certain things were not seen clearly. Patterns were not noticed. Expectations were not fully visible.

At some point, when things changed, the reaction was not just about that moment. It felt deeper. Because something that had been held with a lot of openness was now not in the same place. And then the mind started coming in, trying to understand. But what was being looked at was not just the situation — it was also the way I had been involved.

One thing becomes slightly visible: that devotion without awareness can easily become attachment. And attachment brings its own movement, its own loops, its own disturbances. This does not mean devotion is wrong. It only shows that when something is given importance without seeing clearly, it shapes the way everything else is experienced.


 

Chapter 19: The Pattern I Keep Repeating

 

After going through these experiences again and again — in different forms, with different people — something slowly started becoming visible. Not immediately, not as a clear conclusion, but as a pattern that keeps repeating. And that pattern was not outside. It was inside the way I was moving.

There was always a phase of natural connection where things flowed without effort. Then slowly, without clearly noticing, something would increase: the importance, the attention, the emotional investment. And along with that, expectation would come. Then there would be moments of uncertainty. And that is where the mind would start working more: thinking, analysing, trying to understand, trying to fix. And from there, the loop would begin.

At first, it always felt like the situation was different — that this time something would be different. But slowly, the similarity started becoming visible. Not in what was happening outside, but in how I was responding.

There was also a tendency to go deeper quickly. To invest early. To give importance before things are fully clear. And at that time, it did not feel wrong — it felt natural. But later, when things became uncertain, that same involvement would become a source of disturbance.

But at some point, seeing becomes clearer. That the pattern is not outside. It is about the way I move — the way I attach, the way I expect, the way I hold. And once this is seen, something changes slightly. The pattern does not disappear immediately. But it is no longer completely invisible.

Earlier, it was happening without being noticed. Now sometimes, it is seen while it is happening. And that creates a small gap — not enough to stop it completely, but enough to question it. Why am I going in the same direction again? What am I expecting? What am I holding? These questions do not stop the pattern immediately. But they slow it down. And maybe that is how change begins. Not by forcing something different. But by seeing clearly what is repeating.


 

Chapter 20: Where I Stand Now

 

After everything that has been seen so far — the thoughts, the loops, the body reactions, the silence, the confusion about truth, the movement of escape, the patterns in love, the repeating cycles — there is a natural question that comes, not as a conclusion but almost as a checkpoint: where do I stand now in all this?

It does not feel like I have reached something. There is no strong sense of ‘I understand everything now.’ In many ways, things feel more open than before. Less fixed. Less certain. Earlier, there were clearer assumptions — about myself, about others, about how things work. Now, those assumptions are not as strong.

The mind still moves. Thoughts still come. Loops still happen. Nothing has completely stopped. There are still moments of overthinking, still moments of getting caught, still moments of reacting without awareness. So in that sense, nothing is fully solved.

But something has changed. Earlier, most of this was happening without being seen. Now, at least sometimes, it is visible. The loop is seen. The body reaction is seen. The attachment is seen. The expectation is seen. Not always. But sometimes. And that ‘sometimes’ matters.

There is also less certainty about conclusions. Less tendency to say ‘this is the truth’ or ‘this is the way.’ Because every time something feels like a conclusion, something else appears that does not fit into it. There is also less confidence in the mind’s first reaction — sometimes there is a pause, a slight question: ‘Is this actually what is happening?’

There is also something else — a slight reduction in urgency. Earlier, there was a strong need to figure things out. Now, that need is still there, but not as strong all the time. Sometimes, things are just left as they are. Not solved. Not completed. And that does not always feel wrong.

So where do I stand now? Not at an answer. Not at an end. But somewhere in between. Seeing some things. Missing some things. Understanding some parts. Confused about others. Moving — not in a fixed direction. Just moving. And for now, that seems to be where it is.


 

Chapter 21: Not a Conclusion

 

There is a natural tendency to end things properly — to conclude, to summarise, to arrive somewhere clear after going through so much. But sitting here after all this, it does not feel like something has ended. It feels more like something has opened, and is still open.

There is no final clarity. No statement that feels complete. No understanding that holds in all situations. If anything, what has reduced is the confidence in quick conclusions. Whatever is understood feels partial. Temporary. Context-based.

There are still moments of confusion. Still moments of getting caught in thought. Still moments of emotional involvement. Nothing has completely disappeared. But there is a slight shift in how things are seen. Thoughts are not always taken as truth. Feelings are not always taken as final. Reactions are not always followed immediately. Not always. But sometimes.

There is also less urgency. Less pressure to figure everything out. Less need to reach a final answer. Not because answers are not important. But because it is seen that answers do not stay.

There are still questions about truth, about self, about how to live. But those questions are no longer demanding immediate answers. They remain open. There is no clear identity formed out of all this. Not someone who knows. Not someone who has understood. Just someone who is seeing a little more clearly at times. And missing it at other times.

So this is not a conclusion. Because nothing has concluded. It is more like a pause — a place where things are left as they are. Not solved. Not completed. Just seen, as much as they can be seen right now. What comes next is not clear. And maybe it does not need to be. So this is not an ending. It is just where things are, at this moment. Unfinished. Open.


 

The Act of Slowing Down

 

There is something very subtle that I started noticing: the mind that overthinks is not alone. The body also starts living in the same pattern — walking fast, eating fast, talking fast, thinking fast. Everything becomes a rush. And when the body lives in constant hurry, the mind never learns to slow down.

We keep looking for peace outside — in places, in people, in situations. But there is no place in this world that can give you permanent peace. Peace is not outside. It is the state of your system.

When you slow down your body, you are not just slowing movement. You are sending a signal to your nervous system: ‘There is no danger. Everything is okay. You can relax.’

And slowly, something starts changing. The breath becomes deeper. The body becomes lighter. The mind becomes less reactive. This is not something dramatic. It is very simple. Walk a little slower. Eat a little slower. Sit without rushing. Breathe without forcing.

And in that slowing down, a different quality appears — a quietness. And once that quietness is within you, it does not depend on where you are. Wherever you go, that peace goes with you. You do not find peace in places. You carry it.

If your body is rushed, your mind will be rushed. If your body learns to slow down, your mind slowly follows. And maybe this is where peace begins. Not by searching more. But by slowing down.


 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“The Power of Work: Lessons from Life, Love, and Loss"

The Body Knows.

Touch of happiness